JFK_LOGO_RED.png
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • iTunes
  • Google Play
  • Spotify
  • YouTube

inclusionism

  • we Have intrinsic value.

  • we derive it from each other.

  • we are owed equity in that value.

"Individuals are at their best when they identify with a community and communities are only at their best when they identify all of their individuals. Our charge is Inclusionism" 

LIBERTARIANS

INCLUSIONISTS

LEFT-WINGERS

RIGHT-WINGERS

what is citizenship?

All self aware beings with desires and plans for the future, should be considered citizens with the right to life.

Citizenship is personhood, meaning: all self aware beings with desires and plans for the future, should be considered citizens with the right to life.

Limited Human-Racism: "humanness" determines citizenship, but not for embryos.

Religious Human-Racism - "Humanness" determines citizenship.

How do we engage employment?

If the government avoids meddling (unemployment, insurance, minimum wages, etc) all workers will find new jobs, even if at lower wages.

Embrace data-as-labor: the wealth and leisure created by automation should be shared equitably by all through a basic income guarantee, shorter work week, and new types of work with minimal physical toiling to prolong life.

Protectionism, luddism, public employment: attempt to protect existing jobs, and create new ones.

Eco Luddism "Small Is Beautiful": Stop automation and adopt voluntary simplicity.

How do we think about globalization?

Economic globalization is good: Global governance, worker protections, and environmental laws are all unnecessary.

Economic globalization must be accompanied by political globalization: globalization is good as long as it is accompanied by workers rights and protections, environmental laws, and global democratic governance of capital flows.

Globalization is good as long as it is accompanied by workers rights and protections, environmental laws, and global democratic governance of capital flows.

Eco Luddite: Globalization should be stopped and we should return to self-reliance and political sovereignty. Religious Global Bans on enhancement tech but no other global governance.

how do we support our ecology?

Free Markets: the market can solve all ecological problems.

Technogaian: A combination of judicious regulation and ecologically oriented technologies can prevent and remediate ecological damage. Openness to the cautious use of geo-engineering as a partial mitigation of climate change is an example of a technogaian approach.

Left Ecology: technologies developed by patriarchal, capitalist systems need to be banned and those system changed.

Deep Ecology: Humanity should radically restrict itself. Religious Dominion Theology: Man has stewardship over Nature.

how do we engage reproductive rights?

Procreative Liberty: Trust parents to act in children's best interests, and let them buy germinal choice in the market.

Procreative Liberty, Equality and Beneficence: Trust parents to act in children's best interest, stop them if they don't, give them equal access to germinal choice technology, and encourage them to create children with the best life opportunities.

Limited Procreative Liberty: Reproductive rights, but not extended to germinal choice and reproductive technology.

Procreative Liberty Trumped by Religious Rights: Reproductive rights trumped by religious prohibitions or the need for radical population reduction.

how do we engage technological enhancements?

Market Access and Legal Equality is Enough: If legal equality is guaranteed and enhancement technological are available in the market, social equality is irrelevant and government should do nothing to create a more equal society.

Make Enhancements Universally Accessible: Democracies should work toward social equality, and provide universal access to enhancement technologies.

Bans on technologies as Part of Larger Egalitarian Program: Democracies should work toward social equality and ban enhancement technologies.

Tech bans Necessary to Protect Equality: Equality can be guaranteed by banning enhancement technologies.

how do we support individual liberties?

Individual Liberty overrides "yuck factor".

Individual Liberty overrides "yuck factor". You can't legally "yuck" my "yum".

Yuck Factor: overrides individual liberty in germinal choice and biotech, but not in sexuality or abortion

Yuck Factor: overrides individual liberty.

how do we engage religious freedoms?

Human beings are free to determine their own future, guided by prudent reason. There are no obvious natural or divine limits on human aspiration.

Humanism: Human beings are free to determine their own future, guided by prudent reason. There are no obvious natural or divine limits on human aspiration.

Opposition to Patriarchal or Imperialist Humanism

Deep Ecology / Hubris Taboo: Humanity should be restricted by divine or ecological taboos.

how do we consider technological risks?

Resignation: technology is uncontrollable, government intervention always has bad unforeseen consequences, and risks are manageable without government.

Regulation: risks are manageable with the assistance of democratic oversight and management.

Relinquishment: Risks are so enormous and unknowable, and regulatory institutions so flawed, that human enhancement should be banned.

Relinquishment: Risks are so enormous and unknowable, and regulatory institutions so flawed, that human enhancement should be banned.

radioshow

whcr903fm

SUNDAYS

5:30PM - 6:30PM

 

James Felton Keith
 

Fighting for Inclusionism

Supported by JFK Organizers

Made with ❤️in The Village of Harlem

inclusionism headshot pixel.png

Follow The Campaign --

5df117fd664d0b3d878b15d7_twitter logo.pn
5df117ff96c21e873839dd10_instagram logo-
5df117fe0a00a32b101b1274_facebook logo.p
5df117fc664d0b0e038b15d6_youtube logo.pn
5df0ff5c5910f3052df621f9_linkedin-logo.p
5df117fc1e7b5a83c4255962_medium logo.png
5df117fee9f0166308a6828c_apple-podcast-p
5df117fd1e7b5aaf35255973_file-spotify-lo