Question 1

Guaranteed Housing: As A Human Right

Accepted Answer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4ay0WJXAY0

I've been in the streets arguing about housing. The crisis is on my own block. A former Rudy Giuliani Chief of Staff is developing an unaffordable building to continue displacing people like me in the a neighborhood that I make cool every G** D***n Day! And I'm pissed!

We need a truly affordable housing. As congressman, I can impact that in a few direct ways starting in a single term. 
1. Renegotiate the One45 Project of +900 units on 145th Street & Malcolm X BLVD.
2. Identify 10,000 new units of housing throughout the district of +700 unit buildings
3. Publish the LMI (Local Median Income) so to make legal arguments against AMI (Area Median Income) as a measure of affordability 
4. Fast-track 100% affordable housing developments with city support.

Housing is a Human Right: A Housing Justice Agenda for New York

We must guarantee safe, stable, and dignified housing for all New Yorkers—no exceptions. That means protecting tenants from eviction and displacement, reinvesting in public housing, and committing to deeply affordable, community-controlled development that resists speculation and gentrification.
Our housing justice vision centers three priorities:

• Defend Existing Tenants: Expand rent stabilization, strengthen right-to-counsel protections for all tenants facing eviction, and enforce anti-harassment and anti-displacement measures—especially in historically marginalized Black, Brown, and immigrant communities.
 • Repair and Reclaim Public Housing: Fully fund NYCHA repairs through public—not private—investment. End decades of disinvestment by treating public housing as essential infrastructure and ensuring resident voices guide all revitalization plans.
 • Build Affordable, Not Luxury Housing: Support federal initiatives like the Place to Prosper Act, which bans no-cause evictions and predatory rent hikes. We also call for large-scale public construction of permanently affordable housing, prioritizing non-profit, cooperative, and social housing models.

Housing justice means confronting the root causes of the crisis, racialized dispossession, corporate landlordism, and austerity politics, and replacing them with bold, equitable public policy that ensures every New Yorker has a home they can afford.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_0dbc537805144cb1865ddd770cbab23d~mv2.jpeg

Question 2

Guaranteed Income: As A Data Dividend

Accepted Answer

There's nothing basic about guaranteeing income growth. My "UBI" model does not take from current means-tested social safety net programs. It's the money you are owed on top of the safety net. I'm not referencing any other nerd. There aren't any thought leaders on this issue that forget to reference me. You missed out on your piece of ~$3 Trillion last year, and we owe to ourselves to take it back!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULY56xVRwgQ

For decades I have dedicated my life's work as a mechanical engineer and labor economist to solving the distribution of value problem that we have in our modern abundant society.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_57cc185a89c248d097733fbba62c38bd~mv2.png

I have also written and seen laws based on my work passed in developed countries outside of the US. We can get the income that we are owed.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_096d2582797544d6b96c350a4a6fdeda~mv2.png

Guaranteed Income From Your Data Dividend

For generations, Americans have believed in a simple bargain: if you work, you should share in the value you create.Today, our data creates enormous wealth for corporations, yet the people generating that value — all of us — get nothing in return. That’s backwards, and it’s time to restore basic fairness.

The Principle

Every time you use a phone, swipe a MetroCard, search the web, give blood, tap a credit card, or walk past a camera, you generate data. That data is labor — it’s work. Companies turn it into profit, and none of that profit comes back to the public.

A Data Dividend changes that.

How It Works

We require any company that collects, trades, or monetizes personal data to pay a small royalty into a national fund. That fund returns a Guaranteed Income payment to every eligible adult — not as charity, not as welfare, but as earned compensation for the value your data creates in the modern economy.

Why It Matters
 • Restores a fair bargain: People deserve a return on the value they generate.
 • Boosts household stability: Quarterly payments help families cover rising costs without bureaucracy.
 • Protects privacy: When data has a price, companies have to treat it responsibly.
 • Strengthens local economies: Neighborhoods like Harlem, Washington Heights, and the Bronx produce some of the most valuable behavioral data in the country — it’s time residents benefit from it.

A Modern Update to an Old American Idea

This isn’t new or radical. For years, Americans have shared in the value of natural resources through models like the Alaska Permanent Fund.
Today, data is the new natural resource — and the people deserve their share.

If you want to talk more about the guaranteed income just reach out to us at Speak@JamesFeltonKeith.com

Question 3

Guaranteed Childcare: (Free) 0-Pre K

Accepted Answer

You've already paid for childcare, a group of companies are just blocking you from affording it.

You ever hear people say "let's be honest, everything has a cost." They are right, and you've already paid the cost. Unpaid care, and paid care, are the backbone of this economy and as the is economy's productivity soar while wages stagnant, the value is trapped in the companies that have distributed the income necessary for you to care for your children. We're done with that, we're taking the equity we owe ourselves and our kids.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_ae9deaf26d20467ab3600b17e8ec69de~mv2.jpeg

Federal Vehicle (what the Congressman can actually do)
Add another ~$99–$155M/year to State & City agencies to take the childcare burden off of middle-class income parents.

Plain English
 • If your household makes at or below NYC’s median income: you pay $0 for licensed childcare (0–5 full-day, and 6–12 after-school/summer) inside NY-13.
 • Above median up to 200% of Area Median Income (AMI): you still pay almost nothing (glide path, no cliffs).
 • The provider gets paid directly by the pilot—families don’t front cash and wait on reimbursement.

How we hard-code this in the federal pilot bill

1) Middle-Class Cost Cap (statute)
 • Family Charge Breakdown:
    • ≤100% of NYC median household income: 0% family charge.
    • >100% to 150% of AMI: capped at 1% of AGI (annualized), collected monthly.
    • >150% to 200% of AMI: capped at 3% of AGI.
    • >200% of AMI: pay the lesser of 7% of AGI or actual tuition; pilot still stabilizes supply/prices by paying true provider costs.
 • No cliffs. Income verified once per year with a simple attestation + data match.

2) Direct Pay, Not Tax Season IOUs
 • HHS/ACF pays providers monthly via a CareNY-13 account tied to the child; families never float the bill.
 • IRS supports an annual reconciliation similar to the Advance CTC to true-up if income moved.

3) Rates & Workforce (keep supply open to middle-class zip codes)
 • Contracted slots paid at ≥85th percentile of market rate or cost-of-quality, attendance-based.
 • Wage floors ($25/hr aides; $32/hr leads + benefits) so centers in higher-rent neighborhoods can afford staff; otherwise middle-class families have “theoretical” seats that don’t exist.

4) Coordination with City/State
 • Pilot braids existing vouchers and UPK/3-K dollars but adds the Middle-Class Cost Cap layer so a median-income family doesn’t get bounced because “you earn too much for a voucher and too little to pay list price.”

What counts as “median” for eligibility?
 • Use NYC Area Median Income (AMI) tables updated annually. Median-income households (roughly the 100% AMI band, size-adjusted) qualify for $0. We avoid chasing a single dollar figure; we peg to AMI so it auto-updates and accounts for family size.

Funding—realistic ranges
 • Coverage assumption (NY-13): ~10–12k kids (0–5) using full-day care; ~15–18k (6–12) in after-school/summer.
 • Cost drivers: true cost in NYC for quality infant/toddler care often runs $22k–$30k/year per slot; preschool a bit lower; after-school $3k–$6k.
 • Annual envelope for the Middle-Class Guarantee:
    • 0–5 operations: $55–$85M
    • 6–12 after-school/summer: $22–$32M
    • Workforce/quality/admin: $12–$18M
    • Facilities (HUD/EDA + city/state match): $10–$20M
    • Total: ~$99–$155M/year

• How to pay:
    • Dedicated appropriation in Labor-HHS-Ed for the NY-13 pilot: $60–$95M
    • Re-targeted CCDF/TANF/Head Start/21st CCLC/PDG flows: $25–$40M
    • HUD CDBG/EDA + NYC/NYS capital: $10–$20M
    • Optional: a federal employer match (below) that reduces required appropriations if take-up is high.

Add-ons that specifically help median earners
A) Employer Match (voluntary but powerful)
 • Let employers contribute up to $10,000 per child for dependent care.
 • Federal match 50% (refundable credit to the employer) if funds flow to licensed providers in NY-13.
 • Keeps employers in the game and eases appropriations pressure; useful for hospitals, universities, big retailers in the district.
B) Fix the Dependent Care FSA for NYC reality
 • Temporarily lift the FSA cap in the pilot area to $10,000 and make the tax benefit refundable so middle-income W-2 families with low tax liability still get the full value.
 • Coordinate so FSA dollars flow directly into the CareNY-13 account (no paperwork ping-pong).
C) Mortgage/Rent Relief for in-home providers (supply where middle-class lives)
 • Pilot micro-grants that cover incremental rent/mortgage/insurance for licensed family childcare (FCC) in higher-cost buildings. This keeps slots near middle-class commuters instead of forcing long commutes to care deserts.

The reality is that we know how to fix most things in this broken economy, but we need the political will to do something about it. Plainly, we owe it to ourselves to do something about it: We Owe Us! These are just things that I believe we can achieve. I've been talking about care forever.

https://youtu.be/05sXwcUuj3M

Question 4

Guaranteed Healthcare: As A Human Right

Accepted Answer

Update: If you are losing Healthcare Resources, join our Safety Net (https://www.jamesfeltonkeith.com/ny13)and we can help. New York is the closest thing to "Universal" Healthcare that American's, but you've got to know how to engage the system. Until we expand that, we can help you, especially if you already identify as a member of a protected-class.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_b3362287f3ae42ad8f094d9c9bc370b5~mv2.jpg

Healthcare should be a right for every American, not a privilege for the few, not something you only get if you have a good job or the right insurance card. We need a system where everyone, no matter who they are or where they come from, can get the care they need without going broke. That’s why we’re pushing for a single-payer system, publicly funded, focused on people, not profits. And if we do it right, we won’t just cover everyone, we’ll begin to tear down the deeper barriers that have left too many behind for too long: whether it’s poverty, race, gender, disability, or where you live. Because in this country, dignity shouldn’t depend on your health coverage. It should be guaranteed

How do we get there:

• Single-Payer as a Floor, Not a Ceiling: Universal coverage must be the starting point. True equity requires designing a healthcare system that addresses both access and outcomes.
 • Justice-Driven Design: Policies must be shaped by those most harmed by our current system—Black, Brown, Indigenous, immigrant, disabled, LGBTQIA+, and low-income communities.
 • Public Good, Not Private Gain: Remove profit incentives from care delivery, pharmaceutical pricing, and insurance administration.
 • Culturally Competent and Trauma-Informed Care: Ensure providers are trained, resourced, and held accountable for delivering inclusive, affirming, and bias-free care.
 • All unpaid care is care and needs employer support: child care, elder care, family care, self care.

Question 5

Guaranteed Education: K-16 Free

Accepted Answer

Education Guarantee
Conservatives are destroying the department of education and handing it bower to the department of labor. They want uneducated slave labor from a lower class. We can keep the Billions of extra dollars we send the Federal Government in a State Compact to Guarantee a 16-Year Education (secondary + 4 years). We owe it to ourselves to reinvest in you!
 
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_ddcca1d0afad4ff6a611d986bdfc99c5~mv2.jpeg

Post A.I. Education
We must train young people for life not for jobs. Let's reject the 20th Century's military training system. The pay from jobs can still incentivize career paths and industries to engage young people, but it is critical for democracy that people know how to think through problems and see problems as a process that may be changed or fixed.  We need to teach for reasoning and allow both secondary and post-secondary education to use the latest technologies to enhance our ability to understand the processes of life, faster. Colleges need to catch up to how middle schools are using A.I. in the classroom, and stop enforcing memorization as a gauge of brilliance.

Investment in K–12 Public Education
Public education is a foundational pillar of a functional and equitable society. Despite fiscal constraints imposed by the ongoing impacts of COVID-19 on state and local budgets, funding for K–12 public schools must remain non-negotiable. Ensuring uninterrupted investment in our public education infrastructure is critical to safeguarding academic continuity, reducing long-term achievement gaps, and preparing the next generation for the demands of a post-pandemic labor market.

Tuition-Free Public Higher Education and Student Debt Relief
Escalating tuition costs have rendered public college and vocational training financially inaccessible for millions of Americans while simultaneously generating a nationwide student debt burden exceeding $1.7 trillion. To address this systemic barrier to socioeconomic mobility, JFK supports a comprehensive overhaul of the public higher education system.

State Reinvestment
In a post-Trump world the Federal Education system will be broken. That is an opportunity for us to reinvest in our State and Local systems to both empower our youth and incentive more economic activity to come closer to our borders and cities. We can create the Education Department 2.0 with the $98 Billion that we send away to educate Americans & Global Citizens that will still work with New York. If the Federal Government can't work, lets take our know how directly to market and expand our education system by inviting everyone in.

Charter Schools
Our educators are a communal resource of public servants. Reinvesting in public schools is essential to ensuring every child, regardless of zip code, has access to a high-quality, equitable education. Unlike charter schools, which often operate with selective enrollment practices, inconsistent oversight, and diverted public funds, public schools are democratically governed, serve all students, and remain foundational to community life. When we strengthen public schools, we invest not only in academics, but in wraparound supports like counselors, special education services, arts, sports, and meals... resources that charter schools are not always obligated to provide. True equity in education means funding public schools fully, not fragmenting them through privatized models of public schools which charter's technically are. We need to socialize and expand education to 16 years instead of 12 and create Federal State & Municipal incentives for formal teachers and Industry SMEs (subject-matter-experts) to sit behind the teachers desk or screen. We are failing against China & India and it is because we are divided by economic class!

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_e9e8f6bf82794c30804c24cea905f065~mv2.jpg

Question 6

Protecting Immigrant's Dignity (4/5THs Act)

Accepted Answer

The 4/5THs Act (Foreign Nationals Due Process & Protection Act)

On day 1 in Congress I will propose the Foreign Nationals Due Process & Protection Act to give all bodied passing through American borders the due process rights that even conservative former Supreme Court Justices like Antonin Gregory Scalia suggested they had, and I was no fan of Scalia! He and his peers opened the door for the type of Fascist Conservatism we have today. This modern rogue SCOTUS denied human the basic dignity that they deserve and it ruining the human dream of America claims an its own.  In order to do this, we need an Act of Congress to make laws that codify the 4th and 5th Amendments for humans in American territory and stop treating people like 4/5ths of a human!

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_fc0316ec697a4734a96532e6457e40fe~mv2.jpg

Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Fifth Amendment
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

NY-13 Must Lead
Every candidate will say they “support immigrants,” but most stop there.
Our campaign is the only one willing to put constitutional rights into federal statute so agencies cannot ignore them depending on the administration.

This is The New Social Contract in action:
government that cannot strip you of dignity just because you weren’t born here.

What This Policy Does

1. Ends warrantless searches and seizures of foreign nationals

No more immigration officers showing up at dorms, workplaces, subway stations, or homes without a warrant.

No more fishing expeditions based on accent, skin tone, or passport.

2. Guarantees access to a lawyer and a judge

If someone is detained, they must get:
 • written notice of why
 • access to an attorney
 • a judicial review within 48 hours
    • This stops secret detentions and political retaliation.
3. Protects students, green-card holders, and workers

NY-13 has tens of thousands of people who are not U.S. citizens but contribute every day to our cultural and economic life.
This law protects:
 • F-1 and J-1 students
 • H-1B and O-1 workers
 • permanent residents
 • asylum seekers
 • undocumented neighbors living peacefully

4. Makes evidence illegal if it was gathered illegally

If an agency violates someone’s constitutional rights, that evidence gets thrown out in every court, including immigration court.
This forces agencies to respect the Constitution instead of cutting corners.

5. Creates real accountability

Agencies or officers who violate this law can be sued.
States or cities that engage in systemic violations lose federal grants.
A new independent Inspector General audits DHS, ICE, and DOJ compliance.

Why This Matters in NY-13
Our District Has Lived This

We’ve watched neighbors—students, workers, expectant parents—picked up without probable cause.
We’ve seen international students at Columbia and CCNY targeted for political speech.

We’ve seen ICE use “administrative warrants” to bypass a judge.
And we’ve seen elected officials stay silent.
When your rights are abused, silence is complicity.

Our Economy Depends on Our Diversity

Immigrants keep NY-13 running:
 • restaurants
 • bodegas
 • construction
 • home care
 • day care
 • tourism
 • hospitals
 • labs
 • universities
If people don’t feel safe, they stop participating in the economy.
This policy protects the very people who make our district thrive.

Our Morality Demands It

The Constitution is not a privilege for the select few.
It’s a promise—to every person on American soil—that power cannot be used arbitrarily.

In a district shaped by migration, faith, and family, we understand that protecting our neighbors is protecting ourselves.

Question 7

Housing: The Affordable Cooperative

Accepted Answer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4ay0WJXAY0

Purpose
I will use Federal Funds to re-establish Mitchell-Lama era affordable housing: a federally supported pilot program creating affordable cooperative and rental housing for moderate-income households in high-cost areas, beginning with New York’s 13th Congressional District.

My Reasoning
Congress finds that:
1. Moderate-income families (earning 60–120% of Area Median Income) are underserved by existing federal housing programs.
2. The New York Mitchell–Lama Housing Program successfully produced ~140,000 affordable units for moderate-income families since 1955, but affordability loss threatens long-term stability.
3. A modernized federal-local pilot is necessary to ensure long-term affordability while incentivizing private development.
My Definitions
 • Moderate-Income Housing: For households earning between 60%–120% of Local Median Income (LMI), using the courts to argue Area Median Income (AMI) is inadequate.
 • Affordable Cooperative Housing: Resident-owned housing where purchase and monthly carrying charges are income-restricted.
 • Affordable Rental Housing: Federally supported units rented at capped levels, tied to AMI.
 • Affordability Term: Minimum 40 years, renewable up to 99 years.

My Program Design
Federal Incentives
 • HUD-administered low-interest mortgage loans (1–2%).
 • Property tax abatements (in partnership with local government).
 • Limited annual developer return (max 7%).

Tenant & Buyer Protections
 • Income verification and transparent lottery system.
 • Post-expiration rent stabilization or cooperative affordability caps.
 • No eviction or displacement upon program expiration.

Preservation & Capitalization
 • Establish a Mitchell–Lama Preservation Fund to refinance and modernize buildings.
 • Priority given to projects meeting green building standards.

Oversight & Accountability
 • Federal Advisory Council including tenants, local housing advocates, and municipal reps.
 • Annual GAO audit and public reporting on compliance, affordability, and maintenance.

Pilot Program – NY-13
1. Location: Northern Manhattan & the Bronx (Washington Heights, Inwood, Harlem, parts of the South Bronx).
2. Initial Goal: Develop or preserve 5,000 units (rental + cooperative) in the first 5 years.
3. Partnerships:
    • NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD).
    • NY State Homes and Community Renewal (HCR).
    • Local nonprofits (e.g., Northern Manhattan Improvement Corp, Community League of the Heights).

Funding Allocation:
 • $750M over 5 years from HUD pilot appropriations.
 • Leveraged with private and nonprofit developers.

Evaluation & Expansion
 • HUD will conduct a 10-year evaluation.
 • Upon demonstrated affordability preservation, Congress may expand program nationally.

Local Rollout Plan – NY-13 Pilot

Phase 1 (Year 1–2): Foundation
 • Identify vacant city-owned lots & underutilized federal land in Harlem and the Bronx.
 • Establish pilot developments:
    • 2 cooperative complexes (~500 units each).
    • 3 rental complexes (~300–400 units each).

• Begin tenant education workshops (modeled after NYC Mitchell–Lama Residents Coalition).

Phase 2 (Year 3–5): Expansion
 • Leverage tax abatements & federal low-interest loans for private developers.
 • Preservation of existing Mitchell–Lama & HUD-subsidized units at risk of expiration.
 • Goal: 5,000 total affordable units preserved/created.

Phase 3 (Year 6–10): Evaluation
 • Independent GAO audit.
 • Community reporting sessions.
 • Adjust affordability terms, financing models, and tenant protections.

Example: Harlem Site Pilot
 • Location: West Harlem, near Broadway & 135th Street (hypothetical federally owned parcel).
 • Model: 300-unit affordable cooperative.
 • AMI Targeting: 50% of units at 80% AMI, 50% at 100–120% AMI.
 • Financing:
    • $120M development cost
    • $60M HUD-backed low-interest loan
    • $40M tax credit equity
    • $20M private financing

• Affordability Term: 50 years with renewal option.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_0dbc537805144cb1865ddd770cbab23d~mv2.jpeg

Question 8

The D.E.I. Law

Accepted Answer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmoIetXVqDI

I Professionalized DEI
The reason that I didn't run for Congress in 2021 is because the International ISO-30415:2021 Standard for Diversity Equity & Inclusion (www.iso30415dism.com)was published. I was the Chairperson of the board of the first certifying body in the International DEI Standard. I built a team across 32 countries to use that standard to tie it to Employment Insurance, because when a company settles with a person for discrimination or retaliation, insurance pays the bill. I wanted to make the cost of bigotry too high for corporate world, and we did. So much so that LLOYDs & Zurich started committing to modify insurance prices based on our consensus (the standard). In congress, we need to make DEI a staple across every department and state. I used to teach the Economics of Inclusion at the #1 Business School for Insurance on the planet, Georgia, all from my home in Harlem. I know how we can hack capitalism to evolve it into inclusionism.

I professionalized DEI, now let's legislate DEI.

Why This Matters
We are living in a post-industrial, data-driven society where inclusion is not only a moral imperative—it is an economic necessity. If America is to remain competitive, innovative, and just, then we must standardize how we include all people in the economy. That begins with enshrining ISO-30415: Diversity & Inclusion (D&I) Standard into federal law and encouraging its adoption at every level of government.

The DEI Infrastructure Act

What it does:

This proposed federal legislation will:
1. Codify ISO-30415 as the national standard for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion practices in federal departments and agencies.
2. Mandate a DEI Service Management Framework across:
    • Governance
    • Human Resources
    • Product & Service Delivery
    • Supplier Diversity

1. Require every federal agency to achieve ISO-30415:DISM Certification in at least 2 of 32 DEI Risk Domainswithin 2 years.
2. Fund and facilitate DEI internal auditor training in every department with ≥ 1,000 employees.
3. Establish incentives for states with constitutional equality clauses to:
    • Implement ISO-30415 within their own agencies
    • Establish Departmental DEI Maturity Models
    • Certify local governments and vendors

Policy Goals

Federal Adoption & Benchmarking

• Federal agencies must maintain bi-annual DEI maturity assessments based on ISO-30415’s 32 domains.
 • Integrate DEI metrics into performance reviews, strategic plans, and OMB audits.
State Incentives for Constitutional Alignment

• Offer federal grants to states that implement ISO-30415 across their agencies.
 • Require ISO-30415 alignment for states applying for federal infrastructure, climate, or workforce funds.
 • Create a 50-State Inclusion Scorecard to benchmark progress.
Supplier Diversity Expansion

• Tie federal procurement eligibility to supplier diversity metrics aligned with ISO-30415.
 • Incentivize Tier 1 and Tier 2 supplier tracking and diversity certification as outlined by Supplier.io and the SMI/HAN Playbook.
Workforce Resilience as National Infrastructure

• View DEI as a form of national infrastructure resilience, akin to cybersecurity or health systems.
 • Create inclusion metrics that align with national security, health, and economic competitiveness priorities.
What Is ISO-30415?

ISO-30415 is the international standard for embedding Diversity & Inclusion into organizational processes. It spans:
 • 4 Categories: Governance, HR, Product Delivery, Supplier Diversity
 • 32 Risk Domains & 171 DEI Elements
 • Structured around Maturity Models & Process Improvement

Unlike symbolic DEI programs, ISO-30415 is a data-driven, auditable framework designed to improve inclusion as a business process—making organizations more productive, more just, and more human.

A National Commitment to Inclusion

Every state that values equality in its constitution should also value inclusion in its operations. This platform ensures that:
 • D&I isn’t performative—it’s operationalized
 • Inclusion isn’t aspirational—it’s auditable
 • Diversity isn’t political—it’s economic infrastructure

Join the Movement

This is more than a platform. It’s a blueprint for national transformation. Let’s make America the first country in the world to legislate equity as infrastructure.
“Inclusion is a distribution problem. We must fix the systems that exclude by design, and ISO-30415 gives us the toolkit.” — James Felton Keith

Question 9

Data Unions - Data As Labor

Accepted Answer

Your Data Is A.I. Labor
That can be a good thing

Expanding the NLRB (national labor relations boards) to cover data unions requires redefining the “bargaining subject” from wages and hours to data rights and dividends, while preserving the same recognition and enforcement machinery that has served labor for nearly a century.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po9Y-oNZNPg

Piggy-Back on JFK's work in Europe

We need more Data Unions for both organized and unorganized laborers in this economy. JFK has been at the forefront of policy creation and implementation in Europe & Asian and America need to catch up.

Data is not the new oil. It is the new matter, and Big Tech is putting a data point on every piece of matter in known space and time. That means that you generate an input to productive business processes without even know sometimes. You are the reason the economy is 200x a productive as it was 50 years ago. But there is a problem, your income has not changed.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_53275859f92241ba92b3a56cfeb1e5c2~mv2.jpeg

Framework for U.S. Property Rights in Voice & Body

1. Legal Foundation
 • Statutory Creation: Enact a “Voice and Likeness Property Rights Act” (VLPR Act).
 • Property Right Status: Recognize an individual’s voice, likeness, biometric identifiers, and bodily digital renderings as intellectual property owned by them, similar to copyrights or patents.
 • Non-waivable core rights: Certain rights (like the ability to stop someone from making a synthetic deepfake of you) cannot be permanently waived — they stick to the person like their name or Social Security number.

2. Scope of Rights
 • Voice Rights: Control over any reproduction, synthesis, or commercial use of one’s voice (human or AI-generated).
 • Image & Likeness Rights: Protection over face scans, 3D models, and bodily movements (including motion-capture).
 • Biometric Data Rights: Ownership of fingerprints, iris scans, gait recognition, and other personal identifiers.
 • Post-Mortem Rights: Extend for a fixed term after death (e.g., 70 years, as with copyright) to protect heirs from exploitation.

3. Licensing & Enforcement
 • Licensing Mechanism:
    • Individuals (or estates) can license their likeness or voice for commercial use (film, advertising, AI training, etc.).
    • Standardized contracts could be overseen by the Copyright Office or FTC.

• Enforcement Authority:
    • FTC: Primary enforcement against corporations that misuse personal likeness without consent.
    • DOJ Civil Division: Backstop enforcement for large-scale misuse.
    • Private Right of Action: Individuals may sue for unauthorized use.

4. Remedies & Penalties
 • Injunctions: Courts can issue take-down orders for unauthorized deepfakes or likeness use.
 • Damages:
    • Statutory damages (similar to copyright: e.g., $750–$30,000 per violation).
    • Enhanced damages if willful ($150,000+).
    • Restitution of profits gained through misuse.

• Criminal Penalties: For large-scale fraud or impersonation schemes.

5. Interaction With Existing Law
 • First Amendment carve-outs: Clear exemptions for satire, parody, news reporting, and educational use.
 • NLRA / Data Union tie-in: These rights could be collectivized through unions (e.g., actors’ guilds, “data unions”) to negotiate AI training licenses.
 • State vs Federal: Federal law preempts, but states may add stricter protections (like Illinois’ BIPA already does with biometrics).

6. Institutional Setup
 • Federal Office of Likeness & Biometric Rights (OLBR): New office within the Department of Commerce or Copyright Office.
 • Registry: Optional federal registry where individuals can record their likeness/voice rights to ease licensing and enforcement.
 • Technology Standards: Partner with NIST to create verification tools to detect unauthorized voice/likeness use.

7. Practical Applications
 • Entertainment Industry: Actors must consent and be compensated if their likeness is digitally recreated.
 • AI & Tech: Companies must negotiate with individuals (or their data unions) before using personal voices/bodies in AI training.
 • Advertising & Marketing: No use of ordinary people’s faces/voices in ads without explicit license.
 • Healthcare & Wearables: Biometric data (like gait or voice recognition) treated as property, not just “data” — requiring licenses for secondary uses.

8. Political Framing
 • Property Rights Tradition: Grounded in American respect for property ownership, extending that logic to self-ownership of likeness and voice.
 • Labor Rights Extension: Recognize that people’s digital presence is a form of labor and capital, deserving control and compensation.
 • Consumer Protection Angle: Position as protection against fraud, impersonation, and identity theft in the age of AI.

What Changed (Economically)
In classical labor economics:
 • Labor = Input into production
 • Workers are paid wages for their time and effort
 • Productivity = Output / Input
In the data economy:
 • Your behavior and attention are the input
 • Companies analyze this data to train AI, optimize ads, build products
 • But you’re not paid, even though your data is critical to the process

Get JFK's latest book
Data Is Labor: Essays on Distributing Value to the People
https://www.wix.app/stores/3f6caf8a-b720-429d-b39a-ba6367d6fb2e/catalog/ffe5bae6-cc9e-f429-0403-782294c6aeda?d=https://www.jamesfeltonkeith.com/product-page/data-is-labor-essays-on-distributing-value-to-the-people

The New Labor Movement
https://www.wix.app/events/3f6caf8a-b720-429d-b39a-ba6367d6fb2e/fbedad27-5db2-4af9-830a-e96806521ae6/details?d=https://www.jamesfeltonkeith.com/event-details/the-new-labor-movement

Get a signed hard cover of JFK's book Data Is Labor or buy wherever you buy books.(https://www.amazon.com/Data-Labor-Essays-Distributing-People/dp/B0DDKMXW6C/ref=sr_1_1?crid=38XH76FVPUNOV&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.hGbEswuPXqdtFcA81fgEITlcJS5eD_TM-OKyrc9rEIttk7mWe9Y41abhW5fvWHCd.SvrP5XN9IpmjwlBGOqKtT_M5Rmizg1pjBziufDI01hM&dib_tag=se&keywords=data+is+labor&qid=1754321466&sprefix=data+is+labor%2Caps%2C111&sr=8-1)

Question 10

Data Act & A.I. Law (Unified)

Accepted Answer

First learn about the six (6) Data Bill of Rights, established by JFK in 2015.

Data Bill of Rights
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNTuY3uRQ6M

JFK has been at the forefront of getting these laws passed in other nations and states. 
Our Campaign Delivers:

• Safety: Bans exploitative AI practices and prevents catastrophic failures.
 • Rights: Recognizes your data, face, voice, and body as your property.
 • Fair Pay: Makes sure data is labor, so you get credit and potential compensation for the value you generate.
 • Jobs: Creates new oversight, compliance, and technical roles across the U.S.
 • Trust & Growth: Protects consumers, stabilizes markets, and ensures U.S. leadership in the global AI economy.

Unified U.S. Data & A.I. Rights Law
Why it Matters Economically
 • Data is labor: Every search, click, photo, and biometric detail fuels trillion-dollar AI models. People deserve recognition and compensation.
 • Fair competition: Small innovators and universities get public cloud access instead of being locked out by Big Tech monopolies.
 • Consumer protection = consumer trust: By banning exploitative uses and protecting likeness, Americans will feel safe adopting AI tools, growing the market.
 • New income streams: Property rights over face, voice, and body create licensing opportunities—your identity becomes an asset, not just something for corporations to steal.
 • Job creation: Independent audits, red-teaming, and safety testing mean thousands of new technical and oversight jobs in the U.S. economy.
 • Global competitiveness: Matching and surpassing the EU ensures U.S. leadership in ethical, innovative AI.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_4504a6d38f974e69b425cff9c7779066~mv2.jpeg

Get JFK's latest book

Data Is Labor: Essays on Distributing Value to the People
https://www.wix.app/stores/3f6caf8a-b720-429d-b39a-ba6367d6fb2e/catalog/ffe5bae6-cc9e-f429-0403-782294c6aeda?d=https://www.jamesfeltonkeith.com/product-page/data-is-labor-essays-on-distributing-value-to-the-people

Get a signed hard cover of JFK's book Data Is Labor or buy wherever you buy books.(https://www.amazon.com/Data-Labor-Essays-Distributing-People/dp/B0DDKMXW6C/ref=sr_1_1?crid=38XH76FVPUNOV&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.hGbEswuPXqdtFcA81fgEITlcJS5eD_TM-OKyrc9rEIttk7mWe9Y41abhW5fvWHCd.SvrP5XN9IpmjwlBGOqKtT_M5Rmizg1pjBziufDI01hM&dib_tag=se&keywords=data+is+labor&qid=1754321466&sprefix=data+is+labor%2Caps%2C111&sr=8-1)

Question 11

Interstate Compact: End The Donor State Penalty

Accepted Answer

A Northeast Compact for Economic Fairness
We are no longer waiting for Washington to remember who pays the bills. The Northeast has the people, the productivity, and the moral authority to lead.

1. End the Donor State Penalty.
2. Build the Northeast Compact.
3. Reinvest in our own future.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_2eca46fdfecd427cb1b9fd3634051011~mv2.jpeg

The Problem

For too long, large, high-income states in the Northeast have carried the nation on their backs. New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Maryland send tens of billions more to Washington every year than they ever get back.

These “donor states” are the economic engine of America, yet federal formulas, the $10,000 SALT deduction cap, and small-state Senate power mean our dollars are redistributed outward while our subways collapse, our schools struggle, and our hospitals go unfunded.
Every New Yorker, Bostonian, and Philadelphian knows the truth: we are subsidizing the dysfunction of Washington.

The Fix: Keep Our Money Working for Us

We must end the donor-state penalty and rewrite the deal between the states and the nation.

• Restore the full SALT deduction to stop double taxation on working and middle-class families in high-cost states.
 • Reform federal funding formulas to match dollars with population and contribution, not political geography.
 • Guarantee reinvestment parity — no state should receive back less than 95% of the federal taxes it sends.

This is about fairness, not partisanship. The wealth generated in the Northeast should fund our children’s education, our housing, and our healthcare, not get siphoned off to prop up broken systems elsewhere.

The Solution: A Northeast Interstate Compact

If Washington refuses to modernize federal redistribution, the Northeast will lead.

We will join forces through a Northeast Interstate Compact for Economic Fairness, modeled on the emerging West Coast collaborations. This Compact will unite New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, Rhode Island, and potentially Vermont and Maine in a coordinated regional partnership to:
1. Pool resources for shared public investment in healthcare, housing, transit, and education.
2. Establish a regional reinvestment fund, ensuring that federal shortfalls are backfilled by coordinated state efforts.
3. Create multi-state infrastructure bonds to modernize transportation, green energy, and broadband.
4. Develop regional public health and higher-education agreements, allowing residents to access services across borders at equitable rates.
5. Leverage collective purchasing power to negotiate better deals for prescription drugs, insurance, and renewable energy.

This Compact would form the backbone of a Northeast Economic Union — a powerful bloc of donor states acting in concert, ensuring that our collective productivity benefits our own people first.

The Future: Fiscal Federalism for the 21st Century

When the federal government stops investing in its people, states must fill the gap. This Compact is not rebellion — it’s responsible self-governance.

Just as the Port Authority and MTA grew from regional necessity, the next generation of regional cooperation will rebuild the Northeast’s middle class. Our states already share workers, commuters, and taxpayers. It’s time we share power and policy.

Question 12

Neighborhood Boards

Accepted Answer

When I first ran for office, one the questions that stumped me the most was "How do you plan to build a deep bench of civic leaders?" I honestly, had not considered it. But I have ever since. In New York City there is a set of infrastructure that is ties to the State and City offices, like the Borough President's Community Boards. There are 12 in Manhattan and 12 in the Bronx, but the cover large part of the boroughs, and each borough is the size of Chicago to put it in perspective. NYC is like 5 Chicagos. At the congressional level, I think that we need another set of feedback mechanisms that speak to the hyper local issues of each neighborhood, especially when the boarderlines of the hoods are under attack and scrutiny.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_738e785caa9343d486a1743fa40a4923~mv2.png

When in Congress, I will establish 18 new Neighborhood Boards that can inform all of my spending decision in the district and help negotiate between the areas infrastructure spending that creates social good.
 
Manhattan neighborhoods
1. East Harlem
2. Hamilton Heights
3. Harlem
4. Inwood
5. Manhattanville
6. Marble Hill
7. Morningside Heights
8. Sugar Hill
9. Washington Heights
10. Parts of the Upper West Side 
Bronx neighborhoods
1. Bedford Park
2. Fordham
3. Kingsbridge
4. Kingsbridge Heights
5. Morris Heights
6. University Heights
7. Parts of Norwood
8. Parts of Fordham

These boards will have unique spending influence and serve as a check on power and authority from County Committees from the Political Parties, Community Boards from the City Officials, and Political Clubs tied to elected District Leaders. They can also service as an opportunity to deliver outreach to parts of the neighborhoods that are not in the Congressional District. Let's make more community involvement the norm, because #WeOweUS.

Question 13

Quadratic Voting: Upgrade Our Democracy

Accepted Answer

I was first introduced to Quadratic Voting after meeting Economist, Glen Weyl when he was founding Radical X Change around 2017 or 18. It's difficult to remember. The easy way I would explain it, is as an economist's approach to rank choice.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_3edb4789b9fc4121811f7d3be47c6c66~mv2.jpeg

Upgrade Our Democracy: From Rank Choice Voting to Quadratic Voting

New Yorkers have been leaders in democratic reform for more than a century—from union ballots to party primaries to civil-rights litigation that changed national voting laws. Rank Choice Voting (RCV) was a good step forward, but it still leaves the same core problem in place: voters can’t show how strongly they feel.

A voting system that ignores intensity can be gamed, split, or drowned out by special interests. If we want a democracy where working families set the agenda—not billionaire-funded political machines—then our next upgrade is clear:

Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a method where people don’t get just one vote—they get a budget of votes to distribute based on how strongly they feel about an issue or candidate. The “quadratic” part means this:
 • Your 1st vote costs 1 credit.
 • Your 2nd vote costs 4 credits.
 • Your 3rd vote costs 9 credits.
 • And so on…

So the cost of expressing stronger preferences rises quickly. That way:
 • A person can push harder on what matters most to them…
 • …but they can’t dominate everything because it becomes too expensive.

What problem does it fix?
Under standard voting—plurality, even under Rank Choice Voting—your intensity of preference is invisible. All “first-choice” votes look the same, even if one person cares ten times more than another. QV lets communities show how muchsomething matters, not just who they pick.

Why it’s fairer?
Because it prevents wealthy interests from buying unlimited influence—everyone has the same voting “budget” of credits. You’re forced to prioritize. That’s real democracy: equal opportunity to express strong preferences, not equal outcomes manipulated by money.

Practical examples:
QV is already used in real-world settings:
 • Colorado’s legislature uses it for budgeting priorities.
 • Corporate boards use it to rank projects.
 • Web3/DAO communities use it to allocate grants.

It’s proven, not theoretical.

Comapring RCV to QV
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_b51cf98c34494add85d1d3da61b31dc4~mv2.png

What I’ll Do in Congress

As your representative, I will:
1. Introduce legislation to pilot Quadratic Voting for federal grant allocation and participatory budgeting.
2. Support New York City–level pilots for local elections and community boards.
3. Create a federal grant program for cities that want to modernize their democratic processes.
4. Use QV in my own constituent engagement, allowing residents to signal priorities for federal funding and oversight.

Democracy Should Measure What People Really Feel

Our political system was built in an era of limited information and limited participation. We’re living in a world where data is labor, where every opinion can be measured—and where every person deserves a real say in their future.

Quadratic Voting is the natural evolution of Rank Choice Voting: more voice, more fairness, more democracy.

Question 14

Artist Affordability

Accepted Answer

The Dignity and Economic Strength for Artists (DESFA) Act
A Comprehensive Platform for New York & America’s Creative Workforce

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_92700156399a445dbbf235efd4cf563b~mv2.jpeg

Overview
The DESFA Act establishes a federal framework to protect, stabilize, and elevate working artists across the United States. It delivers guaranteed profit on commissions, fair wages, income stability, and job protection—treating creative labor as essential to the nation’s cultural and economic foundation.

Guaranteed Profit on Federal Commissions
 • Mandatory Expense Coverage (GSA Per Diem Standard):
    • All federal contracts and grants must cover meals, lodging, and travel separately from an artist’s creative fee.
    • Ensures commission payments remain actual income rather than reimbursements.

• Federal Artist Minimum Wage (FAMW):
    • Establishes a required professional labor rate for artists working on federal projects.
    • Protects artists from being underpaid or forced to subsidize projects with their own time and resources.

Guaranteed Income & Economic Stability
 • Universal Guaranteed Income (UGI):
    • A nationwide baseline income for all adults, funded by a national Data Dividend on technology-sector profits.
    • Provides permanent economic stability for the entire workforce, including artists.

• Guaranteed Income for Artists (GIA) Pilot:
    • A targeted relief program delivering direct cash payments to low-income artists.
    • Designed as a bridge to full UGI.
    • Structured so it does not displace or cancel any federal benefits.

Job Protection for American Creative Workers
 • Creative Worker Tax Credit (CWTC):
    • Offers significant tax incentives to businesses that hire certified U.S. artists.
    • Makes domestic hiring the financially responsible choice for employers.

• Anti-Outsourcing Shield:
    • Removes tax deductions from companies that move creative jobs overseas.
    • Protects American intellectual property and prevents the erosion of the domestic creative workforce.

Cultural Defense: Recognizing Artists as Essential Workers
 • Establishes that art, music, literature, and creative production are foundational to American identity and national resilience.
 • Frames creative labor as indispensable—not ornamental—to the functioning of a stable civilization.
 • Serves as the moral justification for federal protections and guaranteed income for artists.

Donate at ArtistsForJFK.com (www.artistsforjfk.com)

Question 15

Open Immigration For All

Accepted Answer

The America that I know is still an idea of freedom and agency that has yet to come to fruition, and the people of the world are still inspired by this, even while we are under attack by Authoritarian Activists. I think that our immigration system should be open to everyone that we can integrate into the philosophies of 1) do unto others and 2) enforce the laws that protect individual agency above hate and violence [indirect and direct].

Melt ICE:
Undocumented individuals who contribute to our communities, often as essential workers and taxpayers, deserve full recognition as members of the nation they call home. It is time to pass inclusive legislation like the Embrace Act and dismantle punitive systems like ICE that criminalize presence over contribution.

ICE itself, has rejected due process and destroyed the bureaucratic infrastructure that gave new American's faith in this place. We must build a new democracy that can scale.

My Family:
I married Andy, an immigrant from Venezuela, of Trinidadian roots that reach back to Africa and India. Our entire family is made up of immigrants, some documented and other undocumented. I want American borders open so that we can, dare I say, double the American population. The ideals of freedom and agency should not be limited to any global citizen, they should inspire everyone to make their place in the world, not just the White Western Elites.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_2d1a374189be41cb97866e8a263b0b99~mv2.jpeg

Question 16

Equity in Public Safety

Accepted Answer

Recently, after an LGBT hate crime in Harlem by a young Afro-Latiné man, activists were divided on our stance of what we will and won't tolerate in my neighborhood and claimed that our rally about this hate crime was aimed to "put another Black man behind bars," which is ridiculous. What they didn't know is that I already spent the morning asking the police not to lose this kid in the system. Then upon being called f*g dozens of times walking to this press conference in front of the site of the hate crime, I explained to the community that we are also Black and have always been here—and the only way to protect everyone is to do it together.

I've been in the streets working with activists, terrified community members, and the police to make sure that there are communications included in the types of safety we expect versus the type of safety we've been getting. When non-Queer folk see this flag above, they may assume that I only care about one community, but the benefit and burden of being a part of this community is that we are integrated with every other type of community.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_ff69626b27204d3bbc4cbac892d0c462~mv2.jpg

We have a choice to make. We can continue pouring resources into a system of mass incarceration that too often targets the most vulnerable among us, or we can choose to invest in those very communities, giving every child a real shot at success.

That means shifting our priorities away from over-policing and toward opportunity. It means funding schools and mental health services, not just jail cells. It means ending outdated policies like qualified immunity that shield misconduct, and rethinking laws that criminalize poverty, like truancy. Because true public safety doesn’t begin with punishment, it begins with prevention, dignity, and hope.

Public Safety Platform Rooted in Equity and Restorative Justice

1. Equity: Address the racial, economic, gendered, and ableist disparities embedded in traditional systems of policing and punishment.
2. Restorative Justice: Shift from punishment to accountability, healing, and reparation—especially for youth, survivors, and those criminalized by systemic inequity.
3. Prevention First: Invest in the root causes of harm: poverty, trauma, housing insecurity, and disconnection.
4. Community Governance: Empower local communities to define what safety looks like—and lead the design of safety systems.
5. Non-Carceral Solutions: Decrease reliance on incarceration and policing in favor of community-based responses to conflict and crisis.

Question 17

Reparations

Accepted Answer

On the heels of the Juneteenth Holiday's acknowledgment of harm done, we can build on the truth-to-remedy process. When I founded the Juneteenth March in Central Park (https://www.juneteenthmarch.org)it was the raise awareness about this.

When I converted my Juneteenth Million March around City Hall (https://abcnews.go.com/US/heard-juneteenth/story?id=71178295)to a 5K with Opal Lee, it was because we were walking towards the things we owe us.

Implementation

Start with a federal “truth-to-remedy” process (commission → bill)

You don’t jump straight to checks; you build the record, eligibility rules, and remedy menu in a way that can survive court challenges and political attacks. That’s exactly what H.R.40 (sponsored by Ayanna Pressley in 2025) is designed to do: create a commission to study harms, consider a national apology, and recommend remedies. It needs support to influence both state and federal efforts.

Deliverable: a national reparations statute with (a) eligibility definitions, (b) benefit design, (c) funding source(s), (d) an administering agency, and (e) audit/appeals rules.

Define eligibility in two layers: “who” and “what harm”

A clean design separates:

A. Eligible class (who):
 • Lineal descendants of enslaved persons in the U.S. (genealogy + records)
 • Optionally, add a second tier for people harmed by post-emancipation state action (Jim Crow, redlining, exclusion from federal benefits), if you want the program to address more than slavery alone.
B. Compensable harms (what):
 • Slavery and its “afterlives” through law and policy (wealth theft, exclusion from property markets, educational and labor suppression). H.R.40 explicitly frames the scope as slavery (1619–1865) plus subsequent de jure/de facto discrimination and its impacts today.

California’s task force is a useful template here: it built a formal harms record and recommended cash (or equivalent) as part of any program.

Choose benefit design that matches the goal (cash + asset-building + community repair)

You have three main program types; you can do one or combine them:

A. Direct cash payments
 • Simplest, most transparent, most “reparations-like.”
 • California’s task force explicitly recommended cash (or equivalent) for eligible members.
B. Asset-building accounts (housing, education, business capital)
 • If your political coalition is skittish about “cash,” structured asset-building can be easier to pass.
 • Evanston started with housing-focused benefits funded through dedicated local revenue.
C. Community investments tied to documented harms
 • Infrastructure, schools, health clinics, neighborhood revitalization in places demonstrably damaged by discriminatory federal/state/local policy.

A practical federal package often looks like: baseline cash + optional add-ons (housing grant, tuition benefit, business seed capital), all within a capped lifetime benefit per eligible person.

Funding: pick a dedicated stream, not “hope Congress appropriates”

Reparations fail politically when they look like an endless blank check. So you fund them like grown-ups fund big obligations:

Options that scale nationally
 • Long-term Treasury issuance (a “reparations bond”)
 • Dedicated federal revenue (e.g., a narrow surcharge earmarked into a trust fund)
 • Fees tied to sectors that benefited historically from coerced labor and discrimination (this can be structured broadly to avoid singling out specific firms unless you have a strong evidentiary basis)

Local proof-of-concept
Evanston earmarked cannabis-tax revenue into a reparations fund (first $10M commitment). That model shows how earmarks reduce budget fights—though it also shows the risk of relying on a volatile revenue stream.

Administration: treat it like a benefits program + a claims process

To avoid chaos and fraud claims, you build:

• A dedicated Reparations Administration (like other federal benefits offices)
 • Standard documentation paths (archives, census records, birth/death records, church records, etc.)
 • Appeals and independent audit
 • Clear rules for estates/heirs, and anti-double-dipping safeguards

There’s precedent for this kind of federal setup: the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 required the Attorney General to identify eligible individuals and pay $20,000 from a fund—i.e., a real claims-and-payment system, not symbolism.

Justification

Moral and civic justification: the state must repair what it broke

Reparations aren’t charity. They’re a public remedy for a public wrong: government-sanctioned slavery and the later government-backed systems that locked in disadvantage. That logic is the backbone of H.R.40’s framing and purpose.

Historical/evidentiary justification: the harm didn’t end in 1865

A serious program rests on evidence that slavery and its successors shaped intergenerational outcomes and wealth. Academic work has documented durable intergenerational effects and the long arc of the racial wealth gap.

Legal/policy precedent: the U.S. has paid reparations before

The cleanest rebuttal to “reparations can’t be done” is: we’ve done it.
 • The Civil Liberties Act model shows Congress can (1) define eligibility, (2) run a claims process, and (3) make payments with an apology.

That doesn’t prove the same design should apply to slavery reparations—but it crushes the claim that reparations are impossible in principle.

Political justification: design it to be legible, finite, and fair

The strongest political case is simple:
 • Defined eligible class
 • Defined funding stream
 • Defined benefits
 • Defined end state (e.g., trust fund sunsets after obligations met)

People don’t trust open-ended programs. If you want this to pass, you make it administratively tight and financially explicit.

Question 18

Neon Green New Deal

Accepted Answer

Let's go nuclear!

In 2025, global investment in renewable energy and energy efficiency has reached the point of double the investment in fossil fuels. We must leverage Big States that give more in taxes to the Federal Government than they receive, in order to build deeply renewable energy sources as we power the future. We should not shy away from nuclear energy and geothermal investment. WE ARE RUNNING OUT OF TIME!!! Climate action impact national and local security, migration patters, business trends, and health.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_54330c3556fa439399bb40844720e4b5~mv2.jpeg

The Neon Green New Deal (NGND) envisions a just, regenerative, and innovation-driven energy future where renewable infrastructure replaces extractive systems, frontline communities build wealth and resilience, and the U.S. becomes a global leader in equitable climate solutions. This is not just a climate agenda—it’s a reimagining of energy, labor, and technology in service of people and planet.

1. 100% Renewable Energy by 2050
 • National Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS): Mandate 100% clean electricity generation from solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, and advanced grid technologies.
 • Distributed Generation Grants: Massive federal support for community solar, battery storage, microgrids, and rooftop installations.
 • Public Green Utility Modernization: Redesign utilities to be public-benefit entities focused on decarbonization and energy democracy.
2. Electrify and Decarbonize Everything
 • Green Building Standards: Retrofit all public buildings by 2035 and offer zero-interest green loans for residential electrification.
 • Transportation Electrification: Universal EV access by 2030 through public EV fleets, free charging infrastructure, and clean bus transit.
 • Agricultural Transition: Incentivize regenerative farming and electrify agricultural equipment to reduce methane and diesel emissions.
 3. A Climate Workforce Guarantee
 • Clean Jobs for All: A federally guaranteed job in the green economy for anyone who wants one—especially in underserved and fossil-fuel-impacted communities.
 • Labor-Climate Accords: Strong union protections, community benefits agreements, and prevailing wage mandates for all green infrastructure projects.
 • Green Career Pipelines: Massive federal investment in trade schools, HBCUs, Tribal Colleges, and apprenticeships aligned with NGND sectors.
4. Environmental Justice and Climate Reparations
 • Justice40+ Expansion: Ensure at least 60% of federal climate funding goes to frontline and marginalized communities.
 • Climate Reparations Fund: Redistributive fund to repair the harms of redlining, pollution, and forced displacement caused by fossil fuel industries.
 • Community Land Trusts and Energy Co-ops: Democratize ownership of clean energy infrastructure and reinvest profits into communities.
5. Green Tech Innovation and Energy Sovereignty
 • National Green Innovation Lab (NGIL): A DARPA-style federal lab to fund breakthrough tech in renewables, fusion, batteries, and circular manufacturing.
 • Open Energy Data Law: Require utilities and corporations to make grid, emission, and energy use data transparent and accessible.
 • Decentralized Energy Ownership: Advance blockchain-secured, peer-to-peer energy trading and local energy markets.
6. Finance the Future, Not Fossils
 • End Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Redirect $20B+ in annual subsidies to climate tech, job training, and resilience efforts.
 • Neon Green Bank: A national public bank dedicated to funding zero-carbon infrastructure and cooperative ownership models.
 • Polluters Pay Climate Tax: Corporate carbon tax and environmental damage reparations from the top polluting entities.

I'm also an advocate for International Alignment in renewable energy policy, as I believe that the best type of diplomacy is investment in self sufficiency for other regions. 
 • Global Green Marshall Plan: U.S. foreign policy aligned with decarbonization, sustainable development, and Indigenous land protection.
 • Green Tariffs on Imports: Border-adjustment taxes for high-carbon goods.
 • Support for Global South Transitions: Finance and tech-sharing for countries leapfrogging to renewables.

Question 19

Environmental Equity

Accepted Answer

Here’s a no-nonsense federal environmental-justice platform for NY-13 (Harlem, Northern Manhattan, parts of the Bronx) with cumulative impacts, toxics, extreme heat, healthy homes, clean air/energy justice, and accountability.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_86c1b5eb14f94dfa9b64ca5b25c64f31~mv2.jpeg

Principles (what we fight for)
 • Cumulative impacts first. Policy must measure and limit the combined burden of pollution, not just one smokestack at a time. 
 • Healthy homes = public health. Treat mold, lead, gas combustion, pests, and indoor air as federal health priorities. 
 • Toxics out of daily life. Push federal bans, disclosure, and cleanup for PFAS and other hazardous chemicals. 
 • Beat extreme heat. Plan, fund, and protect the neighborhoods that overheat and suffer most. 
 • Community power & federal accountability. Keep environmental equity  at the center of federal permitting, grants, and oversight.

10 Federal Planks for NY-13

Pass the Environmental Justice for All Act
 • Co-sponsor and publicly whip votes for S.919/H.R.1705 (reintroduced each Congress). Restores/strengthens civil-rights remedies, requires EJ impact analysis, and funds community grants.

Codify “Cumulative Impacts” in Federal Law & Permitting
 • Back a federal Cumulative Impacts Act (e.g., prior H.R.4592/H.R.9218) requiring EPA & states to assess and limit combined burdens under the Clean Air Act/Clean Water Act; direct CEQ/EPA to finalize and apply cumulative-impacts guidance across agencies.

Defend & modernize NEPA with Enviro Justice
 • Oppose rollbacks; require cumulative-impact analysis, language access, and meaningful community consent in federal reviews; fund legal/technical support for frontline communities. (WE ACT fought to protect NEPA; we keep that fight going.)

Healthy Homes, not sick buildings
 • Expand HUD Office of Lead Hazard Control & Healthy Homes grants; set national standards and enforcement for mold/moisture; accelerate gas-to-electric transitions in public and assisted housing with IRA/DOE funds; pair with asthma triggers remediation.

PFAS & Toxics Zero
 • Ban PFAS in consumer goods and food contact at the federal level; set strict drinking-water and discharge limits; turbocharge TSCA testing and disclosure; prioritize cleanup funds for EJ census tracts. (WE ACT’s PFAS work and statewide wins show the path; take it national.)

Heat Justice for Northern Manhattan & the Bronx
 • Create a federal Urban Heat Resilience Block Grant (CDC/NOAA/EPA/HUD) for tree canopy, cool roofs, public cooling, and emergency comms; require heat-health standards in HUD and HHS programs; fund local data and mapping. (WE ACT leads heat policy; we scale it.)

Clean Air where kids learn & breathe
 • Fully fund EPA’s Clean School Bus electrification and target routes in EJ communities first; tighten diesel enforcement around bus depots/last-mile facilities; expand port/warehouse electrification grants. (NYC’s lag shows why federal muscle matters.)

Energy Justice: Lower bills, cleaner power
 • Prioritize Justice40-eligible rebates for heat pumps, weatherization, and community solar in disadvantaged tracts; require utilities to track and cut shutoffs; mandate multilingual outreach. (WE ACT’s energy-justice focus + Justice40 alignment.)

Waste & Toxics in the Product Stream
 • National right-to-know labeling for ingredients (cosmetics, cleaning, personal care); federal standards for safe reuse/recycling; grants for community composting/zero-waste pilots that cut truck traffic in EJ corridors (mirrors WE ACT’s toxics/zero-waste priorities).

Hard-wire Justice40 & EJ oversight
 • Statutorily restore and codify Justice40 (so it can’t be axed by executive whim), publish program-level benefit accounting, and strengthen GAO/IG audits; require CEJST/EJSCREEN improvements (better heat/flood/air metrics, community input).

District-First Deliverables (how NY-13 benefits)

• Healthy Homes Blitz: Dedicated HUD OLHCHH funding to remediate lead, mold, gas stoves, and pests in public/assisted housing across Northern Manhattan; bake in workforce training for local contractors.
 • Heat-Resilient Blocks: Federal grants for canopy/cool roofs + standardized cooling-center hours and alerts in English/Spanish; prioritize senior centers, NYCHA campuses, and schoolyards. 
 • Zero-Diesel School Commutes: EPA school-bus electrification targeted to depots and routes serving Harlem/East Harlem/Washington Heights; federal enforcement on idling and diesel hotspots. 
 • PFAS-Free Everyday Products: National bans/limits so local wins (e.g., menstrual products, food packaging) are the floor, not the ceiling.

Question 20

Term Limits

Accepted Answer

When I ran in 2020 I met a young couple who shocked me with the question "where is the deep bench" that you are building in local politics. Immediately I thought, it doesn't work like that, but took their question to challenge my thinking. Why not.

My proposal is:
U.S. Congressional Term Limits Act of 2027

Section 1. Title
This Act may be cited as the “Congressional Term Limits Act of 2027.”

Section 2. Findings and Purpose
1. Citizens across the United States overwhelmingly support congressional term limits.
2. New York’s 13th Congressional District, representing Harlem, Upper Manhattan, and the Northwest Bronx, has long been a leader in demanding accountability and political reform.
3. The Congressman from New York’s 13th District introduced this measure to demonstrate that elected officials must limit their own power before asking it of others.
4. The purpose of this Act is to prevent careerism in Congress, restore a citizen-legislator ethos, and increase democratic participation.

Section 3. Term Limits for the House of Representatives
1. No person shall be elected to serve more than six terms (12 years total) as a Representative in      the U.S. House.
2. Service for more than one year of a partial term shall be considered a full term.

Section 4. Term Limits for the Senate
1. No person shall be elected to serve more than two terms (12 years total) as a Senator in the U.S. Senate.
2. Service for more than three years of a partial term shall be considered a full term.

Section 5. Combined Congressional Service Cap
1. No person shall serve in both      chambers for more than 18 years total combined service in Congress.

Section 6. Transition and Application
1. Term limits established under this Act shall apply prospectively.
2. Service in Congress prior to the ratification of this Act shall not be counted toward the limits.
3. Members currently serving may seek reelection up to the maximum terms allowed under this Act from the date of ratification forward.

Section 7. NY-13 Leadership Commitment
1. When James Felton Keith is congressman:
2. Regardless of whether this Act passes both houses of Congress or secures constitutional ratification, the sitting Congressman for New York’s 13th District shall voluntarily abide by the limits specified in Sections 3–5.
3. This commitment ensures that NY-13 leads by example, demonstrating integrity and accountability while urging peers to adopt the same standards.
4. The Congressman of NY-13 shall publicly disclose term count and pledge compliance with this Act as though  it were binding law.

Section 8. Enforcement
1. States shall enforce this Act by  refusing to certify or place on the ballot the name of any candidate for U.S. Congress who has exceeded the limits described herein.
2. Until national ratification, voluntary compliance by the Congressman of NY-13 shall serve as a model for other Members of Congress.

Section 9. Constitutional Amendment Requirement
1. This Act shall be considered a      proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
2. It shall take effect upon ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures as provided by      Article V of the Constitution.

Question 21

The Fourth Branch: Supreme Press

Accepted Answer

A while ago I interviewed a few journalisms professors on my old radio show Inclusionism on WHCR 90.3FM The Voice of Harlem (https://www.keithinstitute.org/inclusionism/episode/ff60c249/show-70-inclusionism-with-todd-gitlin-s4e14-politics-as-usual)about the institutionalization of the press after Trump's first term and they were on the fence about it, so I wrote a short OpEd called The Fourth Branch.

My Message
“The First Amendment gave us freedom of the press. This amendment gives us the institution of the press. A Supreme Press. The people’s Fourth Branch.”

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_1a23c767afb34d39b4718a01a2c2dea7~mv2.jpeg
What do you think of our AI Slop Image?

The Amendment: Establishing the Supreme Press
Our Goal: Add a Fourth Branch of Government to guarantee the people’s right to be informed—independent, protected, and permanent.
What the Amendment Says
 • Creates a Supreme Press – A coequal Fourth Branch, alongside Congress, the Presidency, and the Courts.
 • Protects Independence – No president, senator, or judge can interfere with its editorial decisions.
 • Guarantees Funding – A permanent Public Information Trust that politicians can’t choke off.
 • Appoints Commissioners, Not Partisans – Long terms, multi-part appointments, and strict rules against political capture.
 • Secures Rights – Strengthens the First Amendment by making clear: government can support journalism without controlling it.

Why It Matters
1. Truth Becomes a Constitutional Right
The Supreme Press ensures every American has access to verified, independent information—not propaganda, not spin. In a world where truth may not be synonymous with fact, we need the incentivize the whole story being told at the most relevant local level.

2. Journalism as a Public Service
Like courts and schools, journalism becomes a guaranteed institution. It won’t rise and fall with ad markets or billionaire owners.

3. Independence from Politicians
No branch can shut down the Supreme Press or starve it of funding. It answers only to the people.

4. Equal Access to Facts
From small towns to big cities, everyone gets the same baseline of reliable information. That’s democracy’s lifeline.

5. Oversight Power
The Supreme Press doesn’t just report—it audits, investigates, and shines light into every corner of government and corporate power.

Benefits of a Supreme Press
 • Democracy that can’t be bought
 • Expand the information economy by an initial $40 Billion
 • Expansion of compensation mechanisms of content creators
 • An end to information deserts (local news collapse, ghost      papers, underreporting)
 • Permanent protection for whistleblowers and investigative journalists
 • National resilience against disinformation—foreign and domestic
 • A people’s branch: the only branch designed for the voter’s eyes, not the politician’s power

Question 22

Supreme Court Expansion

Accepted Answer

This has been said by me and so many others. There are many petitions, but it is necessary to state it again on this campaign site.  We must expand the court.

1. Why 13? (Core Argument)
 • Historical Precedent:
    • Congress has changed the Court’s size 7 times in U.S. history.
    • 9 seats was set in 1869, when the U.S. had 9 circuit courts. Today we have 13 circuits,       yet still only 9 justices.
 • Modern Justification:
    • Expansion is not radical — it’s a correction to match the scale of today’s judiciary.
    • More circuits → more cases → more workload → need more justices.
 • Rhetoric: “We don’t ride around in horse-drawn buggies anymore, and we shouldn’t be governing with a court structure frozen in the 19th century.”

2. The Problem with 9 Justices Today
 • Partisan Capture: A handful of seats have been manipulated by politicians (e.g., blocking confirmations, rushing appointments).
 • Disproportionate Power: 9 people decide the fate of 330      million.
 • Erosion of Trust: Approval ratings of the Court are at historic lows.
 • Modern Rhetoric: “When the Court plays politics, it loses legitimacy. A bigger bench means fewer power plays.”

3. The Solution: Expand to 13
 • Benefits of Expansion:
    • More justices = less dominance by any single ideology.
    • Greater diversity of thought, backgrounds, and lived experiences.
    • Reduces the stakes of any one appointment fight.
 • Framing:
    • Call it “Court Modernization” or “Judicial Balancing” instead of “Court Packing.”
    • Position it as pro-democracy reform, not partisanship.

4. Frequently Asked Questions (Anticipating Criticism)
 • Q: Isn’t this just a power grab?
      A: No. Congress has always set the Court’s size. The Court grew as the nation grew. Expansion now is about scale and fairness, not partisanship.
 • Q: Won’t the other party just add      more later?
      A: They could — but the real safeguard is building a broad base of public trust. A Court that reflects the people is harder to delegitimize.
 • Q: Why not term limits instead?
      A: We support exploring term limits too — but expansion can happen immediately      through legislation without needing a constitutional amendment.

5. What’s at Stake
 • Rights on the Line: reproductive rights, voting rights, labor rights, environmental protections.
 • Democracy vs. Minority Rule: The Court should reflect the will of the people, not entrench minority power.
 • Modern Rhetoric: “No single court should be able to drag America backward. Expanding to 13 ensures justice keeps pace with our democracy.”

Question 23

JFK on ICE In School/Hospitals

Accepted Answer

ICE is being used as a terrorist organization, and it is illegal in our community!

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/ced7e3_ae9deaf26d20467ab3600b17e8ec69de~mv2.jpeg

Here’s a clear, lawful, step-by-step protocol you can print and train on in New York. 
It’s written for K-5 front desks, principals, and school safety. (NYC-specific notes are flagged.)
Step-by-Step Protocol if ICE Shows Up at School

Or download this PDF 1-Pager

0) Ground rules (everyone memorizes)
 • Do not let non-local law enforcement (incl. ICE/CBP/DHS) past the main office without a judicial warrant reviewed by counsel. NYC DOE policy explicitly bars entry except when required by law. web+1(https://www.schools.nyc.gov/school-life/school-environment/immigrant-families/protocols-for-non-local-law-enforcement?utm_source=chatgpt.com)
 • Do not share any student or family info (addresses, schedules, emergency contacts) without parental consent or a court order consistent with FERPA. New York State Education DepartmentN(https://www.nysed.gov/sites/default/files/oag-go-sed-immigration-students.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com)ew York State Attorney GeneralP(https://ag.ny.gov/education-students/safeguarding-rights-immigrant-students?utm_source=chatgpt.com)rotecting Student Privacy(https://studentprivacy.ed.gov/guidance?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

1) Front desk: hold the line (scripted)
Say only:
“Please wait here. Our principal/legal office will assist you. May I see your credentials and a judicial warrant signed by a judge?”
 • Photocopy or photograph IDs and documents. Do not authenticate or interpret—just copy.
 • Call the chain immediately: Principal → District/DOE Legal.
    • NYC DOE: call your Senior Field Counsel right away (standing protocol). web(https://www.schools.nyc.gov/protectingimmigrantfamilies?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

• Keep agents in the office; do not escort to classrooms. web(https://www.schools.nyc.gov/school-life/school-environment/immigrant-families/protocols-for-non-local-law-enforcement?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

2) Principal/designated admin: verify paperwork (no legal debate at the desk)
 • Ask for: a judicial warrant (signed by a judge), specific person/records, scope, and areas. Administrative ICE forms (e.g., I-200/I-205) are not enough to enter non-public areas or obtain records. Route all review to counsel. 
 • Call legal (district counsel / NYC DOE SFC). Do not decide on the spot.

3) Two paths
A) No warrant / only administrative ICE paper
1. State politely:
“Without a judicial warrant, we cannot grant access to students, staff, non-public areas, or records.”
2. Decline any questions about students/families; refer all inquiries to counsel.
3. Document the encounter (time, names, badge #s, what was requested). 
B) Judicial warrant presented
1. Send warrant to legal (photo/email). Wait for instructions.
2. Follow counsel’s guidance on scope, location, and handling; keep agents to designated areas; escort at all times.
3. FERPA check: even with a warrant, release only what the order compels; nothing more.

4) Student safety & operations (quiet containment)
 • No building-wide alerts that cause panic. Keep classes running.
 • If agents ask for a child: do not remove a student from class until counsel confirms legal basis and a guardian is notified per policy. 
 • Keep non-public doors locked; use your single-point entry. (Standard school security practice aligned with NYC DOE “non-local law enforcement” protocol.)

5) Communications (tight and factual)
 • Internal: Notify superintendent, district comms, and (in NYC) the Chancellor’s/DOE contacts as your network dictates. 
 • Families: After the incident, send a calm note reaffirming:
    • The school does not track immigration status;
    • It does not release records absent legal requirement;
    • Students’ right to attend school is protected. (Plyler/State guidance).

6) Legal & community support (same day)
 • Connect affected families (confidentially) to free legal help:
    • NYC MOIA / ActionNYC hotline: 1-800-354-0365 (or 311 → “Immigration Legal”). 
    • MOIA general line: 212-788-7654 (business hours).

• NYC DOE provides multilingual protocols/immigrant family resources; share those links in follow-ups.

7) Documentation & after-action
 • Log who, what, when, requested documents, and legal instructions received.
 • Keep copies in a restricted file (admin-only).
 • Conduct a 24–48 hr debrief: what worked, what to tighten, staff retraining needed? (NYC has reaffirmed “welcoming district” policy—use it as training backbone.)

8) Training & prevention (do this now)
 • Annual staff training (front desk first): practice the script; recognize judicial vs. administrative documents; escalation tree. 
 • Purge unnecessary data: don’t collect immigration status; lock down directory-info releases; reissue FERPA notices and offer opt-out for directory info per state guidance/NYCLU model policy. 
 • Post signage at the office: “All non-local law enforcement must report to the principal. Warrants will be reviewed by legal before any access.” 
 • Know-Your-Rights nights with trusted legal partners; distribute multilingual DOE/State materials.

Front-Desk Cue Card (print)
 • “Please wait here.”
 • “Our principal/legal office will assist you.”
 • “May I see a judicial warrant signed by a judge?”
 • (Make copies → call principal → call legal.)
 • Do not answer questions about students/families.
 • Keep agents in the office until legal responds.

Notes by jurisdiction
 • NYC public schools: Follow DOE “Protocols for Non-Local Law Enforcement.” Use your Senior Field Counsel; share DOE immigrant-family resources (multi-language). 
 • Outside NYC (rest of NYS): Follow NYSED/NY AG joint guidance on FERPA, data collection limits, and responding to immigration inquiries; loop in district counsel immediately.

Question 24

JFK on ICE In School/Hospitals (copy)

Accepted Answer